Do you believe punishment for crime in the United States achieves what it should? – Best Sample Solution(2022)
This article covers sample solution to the question : Do you believe punishment for crime in the United States achieves what it should? Plus solution to other featured questions.
As you follow along, remember that our qualified writers are always ready to help in any of your nursing assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us! (Do you believe punishment for crime in the United States achieves what it should?)
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Do you believe punishment for crime in the United States achieves what it should? Explain.
Are there any crimes that are currently punished that you think should not be? Explain.
Is there any punishment that you believe is unethical or immoral? Explain.
Solution
Week 5 Discussion
Do you believe punishment for crime in the United States achieves what it should?
Punishment of crime in the US does not necessarily achieve what it should. Punishment as a means of determent has failed to deter convicts from re-offending or members of the society from committing crimes such as drugs distribution and sale. Moreover, when punishment is used as a means of rehabilitation, prisoners and penal experts have shown that prisons are less likely to change the behavior of individuals, and consequently leads to an increase in the chances of offenders to re-offend. Lastly, when punishment is used to facilitate avoidance, it is not an effective punishing plan leading to some scholars to support the idea of prisons becoming extra punitive (van Ginneken, 2016).
According to Roodman, (2017), there are three categories of crimes; infractions crimes (mildest crimes), misdemeanors crimes (more serious), and felonies meaning the most serious crimes. Considering that crime is a crime, every crime should be punished but only in a manner where the degree of punishment is commensurate with the atrocity committed. Subsequently, each punishment should vary in such a way that the most serious crimes get a high level of punishments and infractions crimes to get lower levels of punishments.
As you continue reading, remember that our top and qualified writers are here to help with any of your assignments . All you need to do is place an order with us.
Some of the crimes I believe to be morally unacceptable and unethical include public shaming, the death penalty, torture, stoning and whipping. I believe that modern society has better and dignified approaches to punishment such as life in imprisonment. Punishment of crime in the US should be designed in a manner that achieves the intended purpose of both the criminal and civil justice system.
References
Roodman, D. (2017). The impacts of incarceration on crime. Open Philanthropy Project, September.
van Ginneken, E. F. (2016). The pain and purpose of punishment: A subjective perspective. Working Paper 22, The Howard League of Penal Reform
Question
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
- Do you believe punishment for crime in the United States achieves what it should? Explain.
- Are there any crimes that are currently punished that you think should not be? Explain.
- Is there any punishment that you believe is unethical or immoral? Explain.
Related FAQs
1. What is the purpose of criminal punishment in the United States?
“Laws without enforcement are just good advice.” The primary purpose of criminal law is punishment. Through the enforcement of criminal law, society seeks to hold offenders accountable for their individual misdeeds, protect society, and change future behavior.
2. Is punishment an effective solution to crime?
Increasing the severity of punishment does little to deter crime. Laws and policies designed to deter crime by focusing mainly on increasing the severity of punishment are ineffective partly because criminals know little about the sanctions for specific crimes.
3. Why should crimes be punished?
General deterrence prevents crime by frightening the public with the punishment of an individual defendant. Incapacitation prevents crime by removing a defendant from society. Rehabilitation prevents crime by altering a defendant’s behavior.
4. What should be the purpose of punishment?
The utilization of punishment is justified in terms of deterrence, retribution, or incapacitation. The deterrence position maintains that if the offender is punished, not only the offender by also those who see his example are deterred from further offenses.